4.7 Article

Diffusional Mechanisms Augment the Fluorine MR Relaxation in Paramagnetic Perfluorocarbon Nanoparticles That Provides a Relaxation Switch for Detecting Cellular Endosomal Activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 653-661

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22656

关键词

perfluorocarbon nanoparticle; paramagnetic relaxation enhancement; diffusion; longitudinal relaxation; endosome; macrophage

资金

  1. NIH [U54 CA119342, R01 HL073646]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To develop a physical model for the F-19 relaxation enhancement in paramagnetic perfluorocarbon nanoparticles (PFC NP) and demonstrate its application in monitoring cellular endosomal functionality through a F-19 relaxation switch phenomenon. Materials and Methods: An explicit expression for 19F longitudinal relaxation enhancement was derived analytically. Monte-Carlo simulation was performed to confirm the gadolinium-induced magnetic field inhomogeneity Inside the PFC NP. Field-dependent T-1 measurements for three types of paramagnetic PFC NPs were carried out to validate the theoretical prediction. Based on the physical model, F-19 and H-1 relaxation properties of macrophage internalized paramagnetic PFC NPs were measured to evaluate the intracellular process of NPs by macrophages in vitro. Results: The theoretical description was confirmed experimentally by field-dependent T-1 measurements. The shortening of F-19 T-1 was found to be attributed to the Brownian motion of PFC molecules inside the NP in conjunction with their ability to permeate into the lipid surfactant coating. A dramatic change of F-19 T-1 was observed upon endocytosis, revealing the transition from intact bound PFC NP to processed constituents. Conclusion: The proposed first-principle analysis of F-19 spins in paramagnetic PFC NP relates their structural parameters to the special MR relaxation features. The demonstrated F-19 relaxation switch phenomenon is potentially useful for monitoring cellular endosomal functionality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据