4.7 Article

Prostate Cancer: Utility of Fusion of T2-Weighted and High b-Value Diffusion-Weighted Images for Peripheral Zone Tumor Detection and Localization

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 95-100

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22598

关键词

prostate cancer; T2-weighted imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging; fusion

资金

  1. Joseph and Diane Steinberg Charitable Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the utility of fusion of T2-weighted images (T2WI) and high b-value diffusion-weighted images (DWI) for prostate cancer detection and localization. Materials and Methods: In this IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant study, 42 patients with prostate cancer underwent MRI including multiplanar T2WI and axial DWI before prostatectomy. Two independent radiologists first assessed multiplanar T2WI and axial DWIb-1000 images and recorded whether tumor was present in each sextant. Axial T2WI was then fused with axial DWIb-1000 images, and the radiologists re-evaluated each sextant for tumor. Accuracy was compared using generalized estimating equations based on a binary logistic regression model. Results: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for tumor detection on a sextant-basis using separate and fused image sets was 65.1%, 50.8%, 78.0%, 67.8%, and 63.6% and 71.0%, 60.8%, 80.3%, 73.7%, and 69.3%, respectively, for reader 1, and 54.0%, 42.5%, 64.4%, 52.0%, and 55.2%, and 61.1%, 56.7%, 65.2%, 59.6%, and 62.3%, respectively, for reader 2. The improvements in accuracy, sensitivity, and NPV using fused images were statistically significant for both readers, as was the improvement In PPV for reader 2 (P ranging from <0.0001 to 0.041). With either separate or fused images, there was greater sensitivity for tumors of higher grade or larger size (P ranging from <0.001 to 0.099). Conclusion: Fusion of T2WI and high b-value DWI resulted in significant improvements in sensitivity and accuracy for tumor detection on a sextant-basis, with similar specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据