4.7 Article

Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: Early experience

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 714-719

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21480

关键词

diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging; lymph nodes; neoplasm metastasis; lymphatic metastasis; uterine cervical neoplasms

资金

  1. Korea Research Foundation
  2. Korean government MOEHRD [KRF-2006-E00406]
  3. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF)
  4. MOST [R01-2006-000-10998-0]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [R01-2006-000-10998-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the differentiation of metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: In 125 patients who underwent lymph node dissection for uterine cervical cancer, DWI was performed at b value of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2). By referring to the surgical maps of the pelvic lymph nodes, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was compared in the metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes, and receiver-operating-characteristics analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the ADC in differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes. Results: The ADC were significantly lower in the metastatic lymph nodes (0.7651 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s +/- 0.1137) than in the nonmetastatic lymph nodes (1.0021 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s +/- 0.1859: P < 0.001). The area-under-the-curve of ADC for differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes, was 0.902. The sensitivity and specificity of ADC for differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes, were 87% for the ADC and 80%, respectively. Conclusion: DWI is feasible for differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据