4.7 Article

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) derived transfer coefficient (ktrans) is a surrogate marker of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) expression in brain tuberculomas

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 588-597

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21491

关键词

brain tuberculoma; matrix metalloproteinase; blood brain barrier; permeability; DCE-MRI

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology. New Delhi. India [SP/SO/HS-50/2002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To correlate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI derived perfusion indices with immunohistochemically obtained vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in a cellular fraction of brain tuberculomas (BT). Materials and Methods: Thirteen BT patients underwent DCE MRI. Perfusion indices (cerebral blood volume (CBV], transfer coefficient [k(trans)] and leakage [v(e)]) maps were generated for the quantitative analysis. The CBV was corrected for the leaky blood-brain barrier (BBB). The relative CBV (rCBV), k(trans), and v(e) were calculated by placing 10 regions of interest (ROIs) showing the highest values in the lesion. The percentage area of VEGF and percentage area of MMP-9 and microvessel density (MVD) were quantified from 10 fields per lesion with maximal expression of the excised BT. Pearson correlation analysis between physiological indices and quantitative VEGF, MMP-9, and MVD was performed for each ROI. Results: The average value of rCBV, k(trans) v(e), VEGF, MMP-9, and MVD were 3.53 +/- 0.37. 2.04 +/- 0.40 min(-1). 0.71 +/- 0.09. 12.51 +/- 2.56. 18.09 +/- 2.06, 10.87 +/- 1.99. respectively. The k(trans) (r = 0.918, P < 0.001) and v, (r = 0.899. P < 0.001) showed significant correlation with MMP-9, while rCBV correlated significantly with MVD (r = 0.962. P < 0.001) and VEGF (r = 0.868. P < 0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that the expression of MMP-9, a marker of BBB disruption and disease activity in BT correlates with DCE-derived k(trans) and thus has the potential to be used as its surrogate marker.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据