4.3 Article

Solid-state NMR calculations for metal oxides and gallates: Shielding and quadrupolar parameters for perovskites and related phases

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
卷 204, 期 1, 页码 1-10

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.01.004

关键词

Solid-state OFT; GIPAW method; Perovskites; Solid oxide fuel cells; Quadrupole coupling

资金

  1. NSF of the USA [CHE0714183, DMR0804737]
  2. French Foreign Office [530227G]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  4. EPSRC [EP/G007489/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G007489/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Division Of Materials Research
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0804737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The NMR parameters obtained from solid-state OFT calculations within the GIPAW approach for O-17- and Ga-69/71-sites in a range of predominantly oxide-based (group II monoxides, SrTiO3, BaZrO3, BaSnO3, BaTiO3, LaAlO3, LaGaO3, SrZrO3, MgSiO3 and Ba2In2O5), and gallate (alpha- and beta-Ga2O3, LiGaO2, NaGaO2, GaPO4 and LaGaO3) materials are compared with experimental values, with a view to the future application of a similar approach to doped phases of interest as candidate intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell (ITSOFC) electrolytes. Isotropic and anisotropic chemical shift parameters, quadrupolar coupling constants, and associated asymmetries are presented and analyzed. The unusual GaO5 site occurring in LaGaGe2O7 is also fully characterised. In general, it is found that the theoretical results closely track the experimental trends, though some deviations are identified and discussed, particularly in regard to quadrupolar eta(Q)-values. The high quality of the computed results suggests that this approach can be extended to study more complex and disordered phases. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据