4.6 Article

New dual emission fluorescent sensor for pH and Pb(II) based on bis(napfthalimide) derivative

期刊

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 729-738

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.07.002

关键词

Dual emission; pH sensor; Pb sensor; Excimer; PET; Bis(naphtalimides)

类别

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico (CONACyT) [167139]
  2. Direccion General de Educacion Superior Tecnologica, Mexico (DGEST) [2574.09-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a novel dual emission bis-1,8-naphthalimide sensor for selective determination of pH and Pb2+ ions. The influence of the variability in the backbone that links the two fluorophores (naphthalimides) as a function of pH and metal ions was studied by UV-visible and fluorescence spectroscopy. Compounds 1(a-d) with different length alkyl linkers (CH2)(n) (n = 1, 2,4 and 6) showed no excimer formation in aqueous solution. Fluorescence emission of these derivatives varied in a narrow range of pH (5-8) and was only slightly influenced by the addition of metal ions in CH3CN solutions. However, derivative le with amino-containing spacer (CH2-NH-CH2) showed excimer emission in aqueous solution, a wide response to pH (2.5-9.5) and fluorescence enhancement with selective behavior towards metal ions. The pH sensor based in derivative le has a sufficient selectivity for practical pH monitoring in the presence of Li+, Na+, K+, Cs+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Ba2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+. The coordination chemistry of these complexes was studied by UV-Vis, fluorescence and H-1 NMR. This chemosensor displayed high selectivity fluorescence enhancement toward Pb2+ ions in the presence of the metals ions mentioned in CH3CN solutions. Competitive assays show that a 1-fold of metal cations in each case, compared with Pb2+ ions, results in less than +/- 5% fluorescence intensity changes. Linear calibration up to 1 x 10(-5) M for Pb(II) ions (R = 0.9968) was obtained and detection limit resulted of 5.0 x 10(-8) M. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据