4.2 Article

Excess Conductivity Analysis of (Cu0.5Tl0.5)-1223 Substituted by Pr and La

期刊

JOURNAL OF LOW TEMPERATURE PHYSICS
卷 163, 期 3-4, 页码 184-202

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10909-010-0339-4

关键词

High-T-c superconductors; (Cu0.5Tl0,5)-1223; Thermodynamic properties; Electronic transport; X-ray

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Series of superconducting samples of type Cu0.5Tl0,5 Ba2Ca2-y R (y) Cu3O10-delta , where R=Pr and La with 0a parts per thousand currency signya parts per thousand currency sign0.20, were prepared in a sealed quartz tube via a single-step solid-state reaction technique. The prepared samples were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and electron dispersive X-ray (EDX). XRD studies indicated that the tetragonal structure of (Cu0.5Tl0.5)-1223 phase does not change by Pr or La-substitutions whereas the lattice parameters a and c do. The elemental compositions analysis, determined from EDX, indicated that both Pr and La were successfully introduced into the microstructure of (Cu0.5Tl0.5)-1223 phase. The electrical resistivity rho(T) was measured as a function of temperature using conventional dc four-probe technique. The fluctuation conductivity Delta sigma, above the superconducting transition temperature T (c), was analyzed as a function of temperature using Aslamazov and Larkin model. It exhibits four different fluctuation regions namely critical (cr), three-dimensional (3D), two-dimensional (2D), and short-wave (sw). The zero-temperature coherence length, effective layer thickness of the two-dimensional system and inter-layer coupling strength were estimated as a function of the substitution-content y. Furthermore, the thermodynamics critical field, lower critical magnetic field, upper critical magnetic field, critical current density and Fermi energy were calculated from the Ginzburg number. The data indicated that both Pr and La-substitutions have quite similar behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据