4.5 Article

A new practical approach to risk management for underground mining project in Quebec

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.04.014

关键词

Mining projects; Underground goldmines; Risk management; Occupational health and safety (OHS); Multi-criteria analysis (AHP)

资金

  1. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et Technologies (FRQNT)
  2. Institut de recherche Robert-Sauve en sante et en securite du travail (IRSST)
  3. Universite du Quebec en Abitibi-Temiscamingue (Fonds institutionnel de la recherche, FIR)
  4. Equipe de recherche en securite du travail (EREST) at Ecole de technologie superieure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mining industry worldwide is currently experiencing an economic boom that is contributing to economic recovery and social progress in many countries. For this to continue, the mining industry must meet several challenges associated with the start-up of new projects. In a highly complex and uncertain environment, rigorous management of risks remains indispensable in order to repel threats to the success of mining. In this article, a new practical approach to risk management in mining projects is presented. This approach is based on a novel concept called hazard concentration and on the multi-criteria analysis method known as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The aim of the study is to extend the use of this approach to goldmines throughout Quebec. The work is part of a larger research project of which the aim is to propose a method suitable for managing practically all risks inherent in mining projects. This study shows the importance of taking occupational health and safety (OHS) into account in all operational activities of the mine. All project risks identified by the team can be evaluated. An adaptable database cataloguing about 250 potential hazards in an underground goldmine was constructed. In spite of limitations, the results obtained in this study are potentially applicable throughout the Quebec mining sector. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据