4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The UK Buncefield incident - The view from a UK risk assessment engineer

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.09.001

关键词

Buncefield; VCE; Multi Energy Method; Detonation; Wind; Hazard identification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The large release of petrol from a storage tank at the Buncefield storage site in December 2005 and subsequent explosion of the extensive vapour cloud formed has resulted in significant learning for operators of large flammable liquid storage systems. This paper presents the personal views of the key aspects of this learning that are pertinent to those who undertake hazard identification and risk assessment studies of such sites, either as part of the safe design of a new installation or as part of a periodic review of the safety of an existing installation. These views have arisen from involvement as an expert witness in the legal action brought against the fuel storage operators at Buncefield in December 2005 under UK Civil Law and also from the experience of providing consultancy support to operators of similar storage systems pre and post the Buncefield incident. The view is from an engineer typically being asked to support operations using recognized assessment methods and practices to develop safety cases and design safety reviews. This paper is aimed at those who would need to identify and assess the fire and explosion hazards and risks from Buncefield-type installations, i.e. any large flammable liquid storage systems at or near atmospheric pressure. The paper covers: -the lack of awareness, prior to the Buncefield incident, of previous incidents at similar installations involving explosions and fires from loss of containment of significant quantities of petrol and its implications -important factors to consider in identifying and assessing fire and explosion risks -important aspects of design and operation for risk mitigation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据