4.6 Article

NPC1L1-dependent intestinal cholesterol absorption requires ganglioside GM3 in membrane microdomains

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 11, 页码 2181-2187

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M089201

关键词

gangliosides; monosialodihexosylganglioside; cholesterol absorption; hypercholesterolemia; lipid transport; Niemann-Pick C1-like 1

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Research [16H04767]
  2. Mizutani Foundation for Glycoscience
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Fugaku Trust for Medicinal Research
  5. Naito Foundation
  6. Ono Medical Research Foundation
  7. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  8. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intestinal cholesterol absorption is a key regulator of systemic cholesterol homeostasis. Excessive dietary cholesterol and its intestinal uptake lead to hypercholesterolemia, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Intestinal cholesterol uptake is mediated by Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1), a transmembrane protein localized in membrane microdomains (lipid rafts) enriched in gangliosides and cholesterol. The roles of gangliosides, such as monosialodihexosylganglioside (GM3) and its synthesizing enzyme GM3 synthase (GM3S), in NPC1L1-dependent cholesterol uptake have not been examined previously. Here, we examined NPC1L1-dependent cholesterol uptake in a cell model as well as in wild-type and apoE-deficient mice fed normal or high-cholesterol diets. We showed that NPC1L1-dependent cholesterol uptake was impaired in GM3S-deficient cells and that GM3S deficiency promoted resistance to hypercholesterolemia in both wild-type and apoE-deficient mice fed the high-cholesterol but not the normal diet. Our findings suggest that GM3 and related gangliosides are essential for NPC1L1-mediated intestinal cholesterol absorption and are potential targets for hypercholesterolemia therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据