4.6 Article

Characterization of acyl chain position in unsaturated phosphatidylcholines using differential mobility-mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 55, 期 8, 页码 1668-1677

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M046995

关键词

lipid isomers; sn-positional isomers; mass spectrometry; differential mobility spectrometry

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  2. AB SCIEX through the Linkage Scheme [LP110200648]
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Free Radical Chemistry and Biotechnology [CE0561607]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP110200648] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycerophospholipids (GPs) that differ in the relative position of the two fatty acyl chains on the glycerol backbone (i.e., sn-positional isomers) can have distinct physicochemical properties. The unambiguous assignment of acyl chain position to an individual GP represents a significant analytical challenge. Here we describe a workflow where phosphatidylcholines (PCs) are subjected to ESI for characterization by a combination of differential mobility spectrometry and MS (DMS-MS). When infused as a mixture, ions formed from silver adduction of each phospholipid isomer {e. g., [PC (16:0/18:1) + Ag](+) and [PC (18:1/16:0) + Ag](+)} are transmitted through the DMS device at discrete compensation voltages. Varying their relative amounts allows facile and unambiguous assignment of the sn-positions of the fatty acyl chains for each isomer. Integration of the well-resolved ion populations provides a rapid method (< 3 min) for relative quantification of these lipid isomers. The DMS-MS results show excellent agreement with established, but time-consuming, enzymatic approaches and also provide superior accuracy to methods that rely on MS alone. The advantages of this DMS-MS method in identification and quantification of GP isomer populations is demonstrated by direct analysis of complex biological extracts without any prior fractionation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据