4.6 Article

Intestinal CYP3A4 protects against lithocholic acid-induced hepatotoxicity in intestine-specific VDR-deficient mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 455-465

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M044420

关键词

bile acids; vitamin D receptor; metabolomics

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health [R37DK058379, R01DK044442]
  2. National Cancer Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) mediates vitamin D signaling involved in bone metabolism, cellular growth and differentiation, cardiovascular function, and bile acid regulation. Mice with an intestine-specific disruption of VDR (Vdr(Delta IEpC)) have abnormal body size, colon structure, and imbalance of bile acid metabolism. Lithocholic acid (LCA), a secondary bile acid that activates VDR, is among the most toxic of the bile acids that when overaccumulated in the liver causes hepatotoxicity. Because cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is a target gene of VDR-involved bile acid metabolism, the role of CYP3A4 in VDR biology and bile acid metabolism was investigated. The CYP3A4 gene was inserted into Vdr(Delta IEpC) mice to produce the Vdr(Delta IEpC)/3A4 line. LCA was administered to control, transgenic-CYP3A4, Vdr(Delta IEpC), and Vdr(Delta IEpC)/3A4 mice, and hepatic toxicity and bile acid levels in the liver, intestine, bile, and urine were measured. VDR deficiency in the intestine of the Vdr(Delta IEpC) mice exacerbates LCA-induced hepatotoxicity manifested by increased necrosis and inflammation, due in part to over-accumulation of hepatic bile acids including taurocholic acid and taurodeoxycholic acid. Intestinal expression of CYP3A4 in the Vdr(Delta IEpC)/3A4 mouse line reduces LCA-induced hepatotoxicity through elevation of LCA metabolism and detoxification, and suppression of bile acid transporter expression in the small intestine.(jlr) This study reveals that intestinal CYP3A4 protects against LCA hepatotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据