4.6 Article

BSSL and PLRP2: key enzymes for lipid digestion in the newborn examined using the Caco-2 cell line

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 11, 页码 1949-1956

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M015685

关键词

fat; lipase; Caco-2 cells; bile salt-stimulated lipase; pancreatic lipase-related protein 2

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council/Medicine
  2. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB
  3. Vasterbotten County Council (ALF)
  4. Oscar Foundation
  5. Her Royal Highness the Crown Princess Lovisa's/Axel Tielman's Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In rodents, bile salt-stimulated lipase (BSSL) and pancreatic lipase-related protein 2 (PLRP2) are the dominant lipases expressed in the exocrine pancreas in early life when milk is the main food. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether BSSL and PLRP2 are also key enzymes in neonatal intestinal fat digestion. Using Caco-2 cells as a model for the small intestinal epithelium, purified human enzymes were incubated in the apical compartment with substrates, bile salt composition and concentrations physiologic to newborn infants. Both BSSL and PLRP2 hydrolyzed triglycerides (TG) to free FA and glycerol. Released FA were absorbed by the cells and reesterfied to TG. Together, BSSL and PLRP2 had a synergistic effect, increasing cellular uptake and reesterification 4-fold compared with the sum of each lipase alone. A synergistic effect was also observed with retinyl ester as a substrate. PLRP2 hydrolyzed cholesteryl ester but not as efficiently as BSSL, and the two had an additive rather than synergistic effect. We conclude the key enzymes in intestinal fat digestion are different in newborns than later in life. Further studies are needed to fully understand this difference and its implication for designing optimal neonatal nutrition.-Andersson, E-L., O. Hernell, L. Blackberg, H. Falt, and S. Lindquist. BSSL and PLRP2: key enzymes for lipid digestion in the newborn examined using the Caco-2 cell line. J. Lipid Res. 2011. 52: 1949-1956.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据