4.6 Article

Long-term fatty acid stability in human serum cholesteryl ester, triglyceride, and phospholipid fractions

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 9, 页码 2826-2832

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D007534

关键词

serum fatty acids; storage time; auto-oxidation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-54727]
  2. US Department of Agriculture [58-1950-4-401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatty acid profiles of biological specimens from epidemiological/clinical studies can serve as biomarkers to assess potential relationships between diet and chronic disease risk. However, data are limited regarding fatty acid stability in archived specimens following long-term storage, a variable that could affect result validity. Our objective was to determine the effect of prolonged storage at -80 degrees C on the fatty acid profiles of serum cholesteryl ester (CE), triglyceride (TG), and phospholipid (PL) fractions. This was accomplished by determining the fatty acid profile of frozen, archived, previously unthawed serum samples from 22 subjects who participated in a controlled feeding trial. Initial analysis was performed after trial completion and the repeat analysis after 8-10 years of storage using GC. No significant differences were observed among the majority of fatty acids regardless of lipid fraction. Reliability coefficients were high for the fatty acid classes (saturated fatty acid : 0.70, MUFA : 0.90, PUFA : 0.80). When differences were identified, they were limited to low abundance fatty acids (<= 1.5 mol%). These differences were quantitatively small and likely attributable to technical improvements in GC methodology rather than sample degradation. Thus, our data demonstrate that storage at -80 degrees C up to 10 years does not significantly influence serum CE, TG, or PL fatty acid profiles.-Matthan, N. R., B. Ip, N. Resteghini, L. M. Ausman, and A. H. Lichtenstein. Long-term fatty acid stability in human serum cholesteryl ester, triglyceride, and phospholipid fractions. J. Lipid Res. 51: 2826-2832.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据