4.6 Article

Composition and lipid spatial distribution of HDL particles in subjects with low and high HDL-cholesterol

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 8, 页码 2341-2351

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M006494

关键词

high density lipoprotein; lipidomics; lipid metabolism; molecular dynamics

资金

  1. European Union [FP7-KBBE-222639]
  2. Finnish Heart Foundation
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A low level of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, despite the reported key role of apolipo-proteins, specifically, apoA-I, in HDL metabolism, lipid molecular composition of HDL particles in subjects with high and low HDL-C levels is currently unknown. Here lipidomics was used to study HDL derived from well-characterized high and low HDL-C subjects. Low HDL-C subjects had elevated triacylglycerols and diminished lysophosphatidyl-cholines and sphingomyelins. Using information about the lipid composition of HDL particles in these two groups, we reconstituted HDL particles in silico by performing large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. In addition to confirming the measured change in particle size, we found that the changes in lipid composition also induced specific spatial distributions of lipids within the HDL particles, including a higher amount of triacylglycerols at the surface of HDL particles in low HDL-C subjects. Our findings have important implications for understanding HDL metabolism and function. For the first time we demonstrate the power of combining molecular profiling of lipoproteins with dynamic modeling of lipoprotein structure.-Yetukuri, L., S. Soderlund, A. Koivuniemi, T. Seppanen-Laakso, P.S. Niemela,M. Hyvonen, M-R. Taskinen, I. Vattulainen, M. Jauhiainen, and M. Oresic. Composition and lipid spatial distribution of HDL particles in subjects with low and high HDL-cholesterol. J. Lipid Res. 2010. 51: 2341-2351.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据