4.6 Article

Huh-7 or HepG2 cells: which is the better model for studying human apolipoprotein-B100 assembly and secretion?

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 152-158

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D008888

关键词

very low density lipoproteins; Huh-7 cells; HepG2 cells

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL58541]
  2. Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM)
  3. American Heart Association
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL058541] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apolipoprotein-B100 (apoB100) is the essential protein for the assembly and secretion of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) from liver. The hepatoma HepG2 cell line has been the cell line of choice for the study of synthesis and secretion of human apoB-100. Despite the general use of HepG2 cells to study apoB100 metabolism, they secrete relatively dense, lipid-poor particles compared with VLDL secreted in vivo. Recently, Huh-7 cells were adopted as an alternative model to HepG2 cells, with the implicit assumption that Huh-7 cells were superior in some respects of lipoprotein metabolism, including VLDL secretion. In this study we addressed the hypothesis that the spectrum of apoB100 lipoprotein particles secreted by Huh-7 cells more closely resembles the native state in human liver. We find that Huh-7 cells resemble HepG2 cells in the effects of exogenous lipids, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP)-inhibition, and proteasome inhibitors of apoB100 secretion, recovery, and degradation. In contrast to HepG2 cells, however, MEK-ERK inhibition does not correct the defect in VLDL secretion. Huh-7 cells do not appear to offer any advantages over HepG2 cells as a general model of human apoB100-lipoprotein metabolism.-Meex, S. J. R., U. Andreo, J. D. Sparks, and E. A. Fisher. Huh-7 or HepG2 cells: which is the better model for studying human apolipoprotein-B100 assembly and secretion? J. Lipid Res. 2011. 52: 152-158.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据