4.6 Article

Sphingomyelin synthase SMS2 displays dual activity as ceramide phosphoethanolamine synthase

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 11, 页码 2270-2277

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M900230-JLR200

关键词

bifunctional enzyme; sphingolipid biosynthesis; ceramide homeostasis; cell growth; lipid asymmetry; cervical carcinoma HeLa cells

资金

  1. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship
  2. EMBO Long-Term Fellowship
  3. Dutch Organization of Sciences (NWO-CW)
  4. Utrecht University High Potential Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sphingolipids are vital components of eukaryotic membranes involved in the regulation of cell growth, death, intracellular trafficking, and the barrier function of the plasma membrane (PM). While sphingomyelin (SM) is the major sphingolipid in mammals, previous studies indicate that mammalian cells also produce the SM analog ceramide phosphoethanolamine (CPE). Little is known about the biological role of CPE or the enzyme(s) responsible for CPE biosynthesis. SM production is mediated by the SM synthases SMS1 in the Golgi and SMS2 at the PM, while a closely related enzyme, SMSr, has an unknown biochemical function. We now demonstrate that SMS family members display striking differences in substrate specificity, with SMS1 and SMSr being monofunctional enzymes with SM and CPE synthase activity, respectively, and SMS2 acting as a bifunctional enzyme with both SM and CPE synthase activity. In agreement with the PM residency of SMS2, we show that both SM and CPE synthase activities are enhanced at the surface of SMS2-overexpressing HeLa cells. Our findings reveal an unexpected diversity in substrate specificity among SMS family members that should enable the design of specific inhibitors to target the biological role of each enzyme individually.-Ternes, P., J. F. H. M. Brouwers, J. van den Dikkenberg, and J. C. M. Holthuis. Sphingomyelin synthase SMS2 displays dual activity as ceramide phosphoethanolamine synthase. J. Lipid Res. 2009. 50: 2270-2277.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据