4.6 Article

The nuclear receptor CAR (NR1I3) regulates serum triglyceride levels under conditions of metabolic stress

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 439-445

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M800226-JLR200

关键词

serum triglycerides; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nuclear receptor constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) (NR1I3) regulates hepatic genes involved in xenobiotic detoxification as well as genes involved in energy homeostasis. We provide data that extend the role of CAR to regulation of serum triglyceride levels under conditions of metabolic/nutritional stress. The typically high serum triglyceride levels of ob/ob mice were completely normalized when crossed onto a Car(-/-) (mice deficient for the Car gene) genetic background. Moreover, increases in serum triglycerides observed after a high-fat diet (HFD) regime were not observed in Car(-/-) animals. Conversely, pharmacological induction of CAR activity using the selective mouse CAR agonist TCPOBOP during HFD feeding resulted in a CAR-dependent increase in serum triglyceride levels. A major regulator of hepatic fatty oxidation is the nuclear receptor PPAR alpha (NR1C1). The expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha) target genes was inversely related to the activity of CAR. Consistent with these observations, Car(-/-) animals exhibited increased hepatic fatty acid oxidation. Treatment of mice with 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)] benzene (TCPOBOP) significantly decreased expression of PPARa mRNA as well as Cyp4a14, CPT1 alpha, and cytosolic Acyl-CoA thioesterase (CTE) in the liver. These data have implications in disease therapy such as for diabetes and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).-Maglich, J. M., D. C. Lobe, and J. T. Moore. The nuclear receptor CAR (NR1I3) regulates serum triglyceride levels under conditions of metabolic stress. J. Lipid Res. 2009. 50: 439-445.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据