4.6 Article

VLDL best predicts aortic root atherosclerosis in LDL receptor deficient mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 376-385

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M800284-JLR200

关键词

hyperlipidemia; cholesterol; HDL

资金

  1. Cardiovascular Pathophysiology and Biochemistry Training grant [HL007237]
  2. Medical Scientist Training Program grant [GM007281]
  3. NIH [UL1 RR024999]
  4. NIH R01 [HL056827, HL068661, HL085516]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperlipidemia is a major risk factor for developing atherosclerosis in humans, and epidemiological studies have correlated specific lipoprotein levels with cardiovascular disease risk. Murine models of atherosclerosis rely on the induction of hyperlipidemia for vascular lesions to form, but the pathogenic contributions attributed to different lipoprotein populations are not well defined. To address this issue, we analyzed over 300 LDL receptor (LDLR) deficient mice that have been fed a high-fat diet and for which a full lipoprotein profile and aortic root atherosclerosis values were assessed. Overall, aortic root atherosclerosis is best predicted by plasma VLDL cholesterol levels with less predictive value derived from either LDL or HDL cholesterol. Triglyceride levels are more atherogenic in female mice, especially immune competent females, and depletion of the adaptive immune system leads to a global reduction in plasma lipid levels and aortic root lesion size yet does not appear to alter the atherogenic potential of individual lipoprotein subspecies. In contrast, HDL-cholesterol is a better predictor of aortic root atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice. In summary, this large scale analysis of high-fat diet fed LDLR deficient mice highlight the relationship between different plasma lipid components, especially VLDL-cholesterol, and aortic root atherosclerosis.-VanderLaan, P. A., C. A. Reardon, R. A. Thisted, and G. S. Getz. VLDL best predicts aortic root atherosclerosis in LDL receptor deficient mice. J. Lipid Res. 2009. 50: 376-385.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据