4.5 Article

Homologous recombination into the eosinophil peroxidase locus generates a strain of mice expressing Cre recombinase exclusively in eosinophils

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 1, 页码 17-24

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0213089

关键词

EPX; eosinophil granule protein; knock-in mice; eosinophil lineage-specific knock-out

资金

  1. Mayo Foundation
  2. U.S. National Institutes of Health [HL058723, HL065228, RR0109709]
  3. American Heart Association [11SDG7510043]
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP89748]
  5. Lung Association of Alberta
  6. Mayo Clinic Sidney Luckman Family Predoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eosinophils are generally linked to innate host defense against helminths, as well as the pathologies associated with allergic diseases, such as asthma. Nonetheless, the activities of eosinophils remain poorly understood, which in turn, has prevented detailed definitions of their role(s) in health and disease. Homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells was used to insert a mammalianized Cre recombinase in the ORF encoding Epx. This knock-in strategy overcame previous inefficiencies associated with eosinophil-specific transgenic approaches and led to the development of a knock-in strain of mice (eoCRE), capable of mediating recombination of floxed reporter cassettes in >95% of peripheral blood eosinophils. We also showed that this Cre expression was limited exclusively to eosinophil-lineage committed cells with no evidence of Cre-mediated toxicity. The efficiency and specificity of Cre expression in eoCRE mice were demonstrated further in a cross with a knock-in mouse containing a (flox-stop-flox) DTA cassette at the ROSA26 locus, generating yet another novel, eosinophil-less strain of mice. The development of eoCRE mice represents a milestone in studies of eosinophil biology, permitting eosinophil-specific gene targeting and overexpression in the mouse as part of next-generation studies attempting to define eosinophil effector functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据