4.5 Article

The role and potential therapeutic application of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in TNBS-induced colitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 803-811

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0113050

关键词

inflammatory bowel disease; cell-based immunotherapy; immune down-regulation; murine colitis

资金

  1. CIHR [ROP-92387]
  2. CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MDSCs, a heterogeneous population of cells that expand during many pathogenic conditions, have remarkable abilities to suppress T cell responses. Their role in murine colitis, induced by TNBS and therapeutic application, remains unclear. Murine colitis was induced through intrarectally administrating TNBS, twice. MDSCs in spleen and colonic LPMCs were identified using flow cytometric analysis. In adoptive transfer, MDSCs were isolated from spleen after TNBS challenges by using microbeads or generated in vitro by coculturing bone marrow cells with HSCs and then transferred into naive mice. Two hours later, mice were then challenged with TNBS, once/week for 2 weeks. The mice were killed four days after the second TNBS delivery, and intestinal inflammation and cytokine levels and MDSC percentages were evaluated. The percentages of CD11b+Gr-1+MDSCs and subsets (CD11b+Ly6C+ and CD11b+Ly6G+MDSCs) were increased in spleen and/or colonic LPMCs in colitis mice and also correlated with the severity of intestinal inflammation. MDSCs isolated from colitis mice suppressed the proliferation of splenocytes in vitro. Adoptive transfer of MDSCs, isolated from colitis mice or generated in vitro, decreased intestinal inflammation, levels of IFN-gamma, IL-17, and TNF, and percentages of spleen MDSCs when compared with controls. MDSCs that have inhibitory function in vitro and in vivo are increased and correlated with intestinal inflammation, suggesting that they may be used as a biomarker of disease activity and a cell-based biotherapy in IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据