4.5 Article

Opposite regulatory effects of IFN-β and IL-3 on C-type lectin receptors, antigen uptake, and phagocytosis in human macrophages

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 1, 页码 161-168

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0313168

关键词

cytokines; cell differentiation; pathogen recognition

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research [T58]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [T58] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel role for type I IFN in regulating innate immunity through controlling macrophage phagocytosis and antigen uptake. CLRs are predominantly expressed in macrophages and myeloid DCs, where they play a key role in antigen recognition, scavenging, and host defense against pathogens. To identify novel immunoregulatory cytokines and networks involved in the control of these functions, we analyzed the coordinate effects of IFN- and IL-3 on CLR expression, antigen uptake, and phagocytosis in human MDMs and MDDCs. We report that these cytokines exert opposite regulatory effects on the expression of CLRs and endocytic/phagocytic activities of MDMs. Specifically, IFN- markedly inhibits the expression of MR and Dectin-1 during MDM differentiation and impairs the capacity of MDM to internalize antigens and phagocytose unopsonized Candida albicans. Conversely, IL-3 up-modulates MR, Dectin-1, and DC-SIGN, thus allowing more efficient uptake/phagocytosis. Interestingly, IL-3 counteracts the IFN- effect on antigen uptake/processing by fully restoring MR expression in IFN--primed MDMs. In contrast, the phagocytic activity is only partially restored as a result of the failure of IL-3 in counteracting IFN--induced Dectin-1 suppression. Notably, IFN--mediated impairment of CLR expression/function occurs in macrophages but not in MDDCs. These results identify IFN- and IL-3 as unrecognized regulators of CLR expression and function, unraveling a novel interaction between these cytokines instrumental for the regulation of the macrophage response to pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据