4.5 Article

High MafB expression following burn augments monocyte commitment and inhibits DC differentiation in hemopoietic progenitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 69-81

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0711338

关键词

mDC; GMP; M-CSF receptors; LSK; GATA-1; bone marrow

资金

  1. NIH [R03 AI 079530-01, RO1 GM 42577]
  2. Dr. Ralph and Marion C. Falk Medical Research Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously shown that perturbed bone marrow progenitor development promotes hyporesponsive monocytes following experimental burn sepsis. Clinical and experimental sepsis is associated with monocyte deactivation and depletion of mDCs. Decrease in circulating DCs is reported in burn patients who develop sepsis. In our 15% TBSA scald burn model, we demonstrate a significant reduction in the circulating MHC-II(+) population and mDCs (Gr1(neg)CD11b(+)CD11c(+)) with a corresponding decrease in bone marrow MHC-II(+) cells and mDCs for up to 14 days following burn. We explored the underlying mechanism(s) that regulate bone marrow development of monocytes and DCs following burn injury. We found a robust bone marrow response with a significant increase in multipotential HSCs (LSK) and bipotential GMPs following burn injury. GMPs from burn mice exhibit a significant reduction in GATA-1, which is essential for DC development, but express high levels of MafB and M-CSFRs, both associated with monocyte production. GMPs obtained from burn mice differentiated 1.7 times more into M phi and 1.6-fold less into DCs compared with sham. Monocytes and DCs expressed 50% less MHC-II in burn versus sham. Increased monocyte commitment in burn GMPs was a result of high MafB and M-CSFR expressions. Transient silencing of MafB (siRNA) in GMP-derived monocytes from burn mice partially restored DC differentiation deficits and increased GATA-1 expression. We provide evidence that high MafB following burn plays an inhibitory role in monocyte-derived DC differentiation by regulating MCSFR and GATA-1 expressions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 91: 69-81; 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据