4.5 Article

HIV inhibits early signal transduction events triggered by CD16 cross-linking on NK cells, which are important for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 149-158

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0610371

关键词

CD107a; ADCC; signaling

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [543137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurement of NK cell cytolytic activity in the setting of chronic viral infection is important for determining viral pathogenicity. Mobilization of LAMP-1 (CD107a) to the NK cell surface is a surrogate marker for cytotoxic granule release and hence, NK cell cytotoxicity. We have developed a convenient, rapid, whole blood flow cytometric assay for measuring CD107a mobilization in response to CD16 cross-linking, a surrogate for NK cell ADCC activity ex vivo, which can be performed using small volumes of patient whole blood. Using this assay, we show that CD107a mobilization, in response to CD16 cross-linking, is triggered in CD56(dim) but not CD56(bright) NK cells, requiring Syk/Zap70 tyrosine kinase activity, and that there is a significant correlation between CD107a mobilization and pSyk/Zap70 in response to CD16 cross-linking. We compared whole blood from treatment-naive, HIV-infected patients with age-and sex-matched HIV-uninfected control subjects and found a significant reduction in CD16-dependent pSyk/Zap70 (median=32.7% compared with 67.8%; P=0.0002) and CD107a mobilization (median=9.72% compared with 32.9%; P=0.046) in NK cells. Reduction of both correlated strongly with reduced CD16 surface expression on NK cells of HIV-infected individuals (P<0.01). These data suggest that ADCC is inhibited in NK cells from therapy-naive, HIV-infected individuals at the level of early events in CD16 signal transduction, associated with low CD16R expression, and our method is a useful and reliable tool to detect pathological defects in NK cell degranulation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 89: 149-158; 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据