4.5 Article

The phenotype of murine wound macrophages

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 59-67

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0409236

关键词

IL-4; IL-13; IL-4 receptor alpha; mannose receptor; arginase; Ym1

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM-79227, GM-66194, GM-42859, T32GM-65085]
  2. Carter Family Charitable Trust
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [K08GM079227, R56GM066194, T32GM065085, R01GM066194, R01GM042859] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phenotype of wound macrophages has not been studied by direct examination of these cells, yet macrophages recruited to sites of injury are described as alternatively activated macrophages, requiring IL-4 or IL-13 for phenotypic expression. This study characterized wound macrophage phenotype in the PVA sponge wound model in mice. Eighty-five percent of wound macrophages isolated 1 day after injury expressed Gr-1, but only 20% of those isolated at 7 days expressed this antigen. Macrophages from 1-, 3-, and 7-day wounds expressed markers of alternative activation, including mannose receptor, dectin-1, arginase 1, and Ym1, but did not contain iNOS. Day 1 wound macrophages produced more TNF-alpha, more IL-6, and less TGF-beta than Day 7 wound macrophages. Wound macrophages did not produce IL-10. The cytokines considered necessary for alternative activation of macrophages, IL-4 and IL-13, were not detected in the wound environment and were not produced by wound cells. Wound macrophages did not contain PStat6. Wound fluids inhibited IL-13-dependent phosphorylation of Stat6 and contained IL-13R alpha 2, a soluble decoy receptor for IL-13. The phenotype of wound macrophages was not altered in mice lacking IL-4R alpha, which is required for Stat6-dependent signaling of IL-4 and IL-13. Wound macrophages exhibit a complex phenotype, which includes traits associated with alternative and classical activation and changes as the wound matures. The wound macrophage phenotype does not require IL-4 or IL-13. J. Leukoc. Biol. 87: 59-67; 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据