4.5 Article

Retention of viability, cytotoxicity, and response to IL-2, IL-15, or IFN-α by human NK cells after CD107a degranulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 85, 期 5, 页码 871-876

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.1008635

关键词

perforin/granzyme pathway; killing potential

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI51225, AI47760, U01AI065279, AI07632, AI068405]
  2. Philadelphia Foundation
  3. Commonwealth Universal Research Enhancement Program, Pennsylvania Department of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NK cells represent a critical component of the host innate immune response to viral infection and tumor transformation. Nevertheless, the fate of recently degranulated NK cells subsequent to a primary target cell interaction remains largely unexplored. Here, we investigated the long-term viability and killing potential of human NK cells following target cell lysis using live-sorting of CD107a-degranulated NK cells. We observed that sorted CD107a+ NK cells exhibited continued lytic potential against a wide variety of target cells, including tumor and virally infected target cells. CD107a-positive- and CD107a-negative-sorted NK cells displayed similar long-term viability, killing potential, and response to inflammatory cytokines such as IL-2, IL-15, and IFN-alpha. Interestingly, we observed that the CD107a signature is remarkably stable over time and that recently degranulated NK cells exhibit an amplification of CD107 expression immediately following a target cell interaction. Together, our data expand previous data showing that NK cells retain the capacity to kill multiple target cells in succession and reveal that NK viability, cytotoxicity, and response to inflammatory cytokines are not altered following a primary target cell interaction. Overall, our data argue for the strength of the NK cell compartment in the continuous surveillance of tumor and virally infected cells in the body and highlight the use of using CD107a expression as a stable marker for NK cytotoxicity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 85: 871-876; 2009.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据