4.5 Article

Dynamics of lung macrophage activation in response to helminth infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 84, 期 6, 页码 1422-1433

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0308199

关键词

nematode; hygiene hypothesis; pulmonary; alternatively activated; arginase; YM1; FIZZ1

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [U01 HL66623]
  3. NIH Training [T32AI007417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of our understanding of the development and phenotype of alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs) has been obtained from studies investigating the response of bone marrow-and peritoneal-derived cells to IL-4 or IL-13 stimulation. Comparatively little is known about the development of AAMs in the lungs, and how the complex signals associated with pulmonary inflammation influence the AAM phenotype. Here, we use Nippostrongylus brasiliensis to initiate AAM development and define the dynamics of surface molecules, gene expression, and cell function of macrophages isolated from lung tissue at different times postinfection ( PI). Initially, lung macrophages take on a foamy phenotype, up-regulate MHC and costimulatory molecules, express reduced levels of TNF and IL-12, and undergo proliferation. Cells isolated between days 8 and 15 PI adopt a dense, granular phenotype and exhibit reduced levels of costimulatory molecules and elevated levels of programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) and PDL-2 and an increase in IL-10 expression. Functionally, AAMs isolated on days 13-15 PI demonstrate an enhanced capacity to take up and sequester antigen. However, these same cells did not mediate antigen-specific T cell proliferation and dampened the proliferation of CD3/CD28-activated CD4+ T cells. These data indicate that the alternative activation of macrophages in the lungs, although initiated by IL-4/IL-13, is a dynamic process that is likely to be influenced by other immune and nonimmune factors in the pulmonary environment. J. Leukoc. Biol. 84: 1422-1433; 2008.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据