4.5 Review

RNase A ribonucleases and host defense: an evolving story

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 83, 期 5, 页码 1079-1087

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.1107725

关键词

leukocyte; cationic; eosinophil; evolution; bactericidal; virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RNase A ( bovine pancreatic RNase) is the founding member an extensive family of divergent proteins that share specific elements of sequence homology, a unique disulfide-bonded tertiary structure, and the ability to hydrolyze polymeric RNA. Among the more intriguing and perhaps counterintuitive findings, at the current state of the art, the connection between RNase activity and characterized host defense functions is quite weak; whether this is a scientific reality or more a reflection of what has been chosen for study remains to be determined. Several of the RNase A family RNases are highly cationic and have cytotoxic and bactericidal properties that are clearly ( eosinophil cationic protein, leukocyte RNase A-2) or are probably ( RNase 7) unrelated to their enzymatic activity. Interestingly, peptides derived from the leukocyte RNase A-2 sequence are nearly as bactericidal as the entire protein, suggesting that among other functions, the RNase A superfamily may be serving as a source of gene scaffolds for the generation of novel cytotoxic peptides. Other RNase A ribonucleases are somewhat less cationic ( mouse angiogenin 4, zebrafish RNases) and have moderate bactericidal activities that have not yet been explored mechanistically. Additional host defense functions characterized specifically for the RNase eosinophil-derived neurotoxin include reducing infectivity of RNA viruses for target cells in culture, which does require RNase activity, chemoattraction of immature human dendritic cells via a G-protein-coupled receptor-dependent mechanism, and activation of TLR2. The properties of individual RNase A ribonucleases, recent experimental findings, and important questions for the near and distant future will be reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据