4.1 Article

The Safety of Laparoscopy in Pediatric Patients with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2009.0116

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: In pediatric patients requiring abdominal operations, ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts for hydrocephalus are a frequently encountered comorbidity. Laparoscopy has not been extensively evaluated in this population, and there are concerns about the safety of insufflation under pressure with the shunt in place. There are a paucity of data in the literature to address this issue. Further, there is a relative lack of long-term follow-up in the literature to document shunt function over time after abdominal procedures. Therefore, we reviewed our experience in patients with VP shunts who underwent either open or laparoscopic abdominal procedures to determine the safety of laparoscopy in these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all pediatric patients with VP shunts who underwent laparoscopic and/or open abdominal operations at a single institution from 1998 to 2008. Complications were defined as a shunt-or surgery-related event (including any shunt revisions) within 6 months of abdominal surgery. Continuous variables were compared by using an independent sampled, two-tailed Student's t-test. Discrete variables were analyzed with Fisher's exact test with Yates correction, where appropriate. Significance was defined as P <= 0.05. Results: A total of 99 intra-abdominal operations were performed on patients with VP shunts: 51 were laparoscopic and 48 were open. Mean age was 3.17 versus 2.93 years, respectively (P = 0.77). The most common procedure performed in both groups was fundoplication with gastrostomy. There were no episodes of air embolism into the shunt. There was 1 shunt infection in the laparoscopic group and 3 in the open group (P = 0.56). Conclusions: Our data suggest that laparoscopy is safe in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据