4.5 Article

Comparison of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh Classification and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score as Predictors of the Severity of the Systemic Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Living-donor Liver Transplantation

期刊

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 26, 期 10, 页码 1333-1338

出版社

KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1333

关键词

Child-Turcotte-Pugh Classification; Cytokines; Living-Donor Liver Transplantation; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score

资金

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [A092258]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification system and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in predicting the severity of the systemic inflammatory response in living-donor liver transplantation patients. Recipients of liver graft were allocated to a recipient group (n = 39) and healthy donors to a donor group (n = 42). The association between the CTP classification, the MELD scores and perioperative cytokine concentrations in the recipient group was evaluated. The pro-inflammatory cytokines measured included interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha; the anti-inflammatory cytokines measured included IL-10 and IL-4. Cytokine concentrations were quantified using sandwich enzyme-linked immunoassays. The IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-10 concentrations in the recipient group were significantly higher than those in healthy donor group patients. All preoperative cytokine levels, except IL-6, increased in relation to the severity of liver disease, as measured by the CTP classification. Additionally, all cytokine levels, except IL-6, were significantly correlated preoperatively with MELD scores. However, the correlations diminished during the intraoperative period. The CTP classification and the MELD score are equally reliable in predicting the severity of the systemic inflammatory response, but only during the preoperative period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据