4.7 Article

Targeted Disruption of Glutathione Peroxidase 4 in Mouse Skin Epithelial Cells Impairs Postnatal Hair Follicle Morphogenesis that Is Partially Rescued through Inhibition of COX-2

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 133, 期 7, 页码 1731-1741

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2013.52

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [CO 291/2-3]
  3. DFG-Priority Program [SPP1087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selenoproteins are essential molecules for the mammalian antioxidant network. We previously demonstrated that targeted loss of all selenoproteins in mouse epidermis disrupted skin and hair development, and caused premature death. In the current study, we targeted specific selenoproteins for epidermal deletion to determine whether similar phenotypes developed. Keratinocyte-specific knockout mice lacking either the glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) or thioredoxin reductase 1 (TR1) gene were generated by cre-lox technology using K14-cre. TR1 knockout mice had a normal phenotype in resting skin, whereas GPx4 loss in the epidermis caused epidermal hyperplasia, dermal inflammatory infiltrate, dysmorphic hair follicles, and alopecia in perinatal mice. Unlike epidermal ablation of all selenoproteins, mice ablated for GPx4 recovered after 5 weeks and had a normal life span. GPx1 and TR1 were upregulated in the skin and keratinocytes of GPx4-knockout mice. GPx4 deletion reduces keratinocyte adhesion in culture and increases lipid peroxidation and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels in cultured keratinocytes and whole skin. Feeding a COX-2 inhibitor to nursing mothers partially prevents development of the abnormal skin phenotype in knockout pups. These data link the activity of cutaneous GPx4 to the regulation of COX-2 and hair follicle morphogenesis, and provide insight into the function of individual selenoprotein activity in maintaining cutaneous homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据