4.7 Article

Incidence of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Associated Factors: A Population-Based Study of Olmsted County, Minnesota

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 133, 期 1, 页码 97-103

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.255

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Translational Science Activities [UL1 RR024150]
  2. National Institute on Aging [R01 AG034676]
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR024150] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG034676] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are no population-based incidence studies of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Using the medical record linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we sought to determine the incidence of the disease, as well as other associations and characteristics, among HS patients diagnosed in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between 1968 and 2008. Incidence was estimated using the decennial census data for the county. Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and disease severity. A total of 268 incident cases were identified, with an overall annual age- and sex-adjusted incidence of 6.0 per 100,000. Age-adjusted incidence was significantly higher in women compared with men (8.2 (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0-9.3) vs. 3.8 (95% CI, 3.0-4.7). The highest incidence was among young women aged 20-29 years (18.4 per 100,000). The incidence has risen over the past four decades, particularly among women. Women were more likely to have axillary and upper anterior torso involvement, whereas men were more likely to have perineal or perianal disease. In addition, 54.9% (140/255) patients were obese; 70.2% were current or former smokers; 42.9% carried a diagnosis of depression; 36.2% carried a diagnosis of acne; and 6% had pilonidal disease. Smoking and gender were significantly associated with more severe disease. Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2013) 133, 97-103; doi:10.1038/jid.2012.255; published online 30 August 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据