4.7 Article

Autophagy Is Induced by UVA and Promotes Removal of Oxidized Phospholipids and Protein Aggregates in Epidermal Keratinocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 133, 期 6, 页码 1629-1637

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2013.26

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre de Recherche et d'Investigations Epidermiques et Sensorielles de CHANEL (CE.R.I.E.S, Neuilly, France)
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [S10713-B13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The skin is exposed to environmental insults such as UV light that cause oxidative damage to macromolecules. A centerpiece in the defense against oxidative stress is the Nrf2 (nuclear factor (erythroid-derived-2)-like 2)-mediated transcriptional upregulation of antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes and the removal of oxidatively damaged material. Autophagy has an important role in the intracellular degradation of damaged proteins and entire organelles, but its role in the epidermis has remained elusive. Here, we show that both UVA and UVA-oxidized phospholipids induced autophagy in epidermal keratinocytes. Oxidative stressors induced massive accumulation of high-molecular-weight protein aggregates containing the autophagy adaptor protein p62/SQSTM1 in autophagy-deficient (autophagy-related 7 (ATG7) negative) keratinocytes. Strikingly, even in the absence of exogenous stress, the expression of Nrf2-dependent genes was elevated in autophagy-deficient keratinocytes. Furthermore, we show that autophagy-deficient cells contained significantly elevated levels of reactive oxidized phospholipids. Thus, our data demonstrate that autophagy is crucial for both the degradation of proteins and lipids modified by environmental UV stress and for limiting Nrf2 activity in keratinocytes. Lipids that promote inflammation and tissue damage because of their reactivity and signaling functions are commonly observed in aged and diseased skin, and thus targeting autophagy may be a promising strategy to counteract the damage promoted by excessive lipid oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据