4.7 Article

Human Eccrine Sweat Gland Cells Turn into Melanin-Uptaking Keratinocytes in Dermo-Epidermal Skin Substitutes

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 133, 期 2, 页码 316-324

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.290

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU-FP6 project EuroSTEC (soft tissue engineering for congenital birth defects in children) [LSHB-CT-2006-037409]
  2. EU-FP7 project EuroSkinGraft [279024]
  3. University of Zurich
  4. Foundation Gaydoul
  5. Vontobel Foundation
  6. Werner Spross Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, Biedermann et al. (2010) have demonstrated that human eccrine sweat gland cells can develop a multilayered epidermis. The question still remains whether these cells can fulfill exclusive and very specific functional properties of epidermal keratinocytes, such as the incorporation of melanin, a feature absent in sweat gland cells. We added human melanocytes to eccrine sweat gland cells to let them develop into an epidermal analog in vivo. The interaction between melanocytes and sweat gland-derived keratinocytes was investigated. The following results were gained: (1) macroscopically, a pigmentation of the substitutes was seen 2-3 weeks after transplantation; (2) we confirmed the development of a multilayered, stratified epidermis with melanocytes distributed evenly throughout the basal layer; (3) melanocytic dendrites projected to suprabasal layers; and (4) melanin was observed to be integrated into former eccrine sweat gland cells. These skin substitutes were similar or equal to skin substitutes cultured from human epidermal keratinocytes. The only differences observed were a delay in pigmentation and less melanin uptake. These data suggest that eccrine sweat gland cells can form a functional epidermal melanin unit, thereby providing striking evidence that they can assume one of the most characteristic keratinocyte properties. Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2013) 133, 316-324; doi:10.1038/jid.2012.290; published online 13 September 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据