4.7 Article

Lymphatic Endothelium Forms Integrin-Engaging 3D Structures during DC Transit across Inflamed Lymphatic Vessels

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 133, 期 9, 页码 2276-2285

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2013.152

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEC/MICINN [EUS2008-03592]
  2. European commission
  3. SUDOE-IMMUNONET
  4. UTE for Project FIMA
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN)
  6. Fundacion Cientifica de la Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (AECC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendritic cell (DC) transmigration across the lymphatic endothelium is critical for the initiation and sustenance of immune responses. Under noninflammatory conditions, DC transit across the lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) has been shown to be integrin independent. In contrast, there is increasing evidence for the participation of integrins and their ligands in DC transit across lymphatic endothelium under inflammation. In this sense, we describe the formation of ICAM-1 (CD54)-enriched three-dimensional structures on LEC/DC contacts, as these DCs adhere to inflamed skin lymphatic vessels and transmigrate into them. In vitro imaging revealed that under inflammation ICAM-1 accumulated on microvilli projections surrounding 60% of adhered DCs. In contrast, these structures were scarcely formed in noninflammatory conditions. Furthermore, ICAM-1-enriched microvilli were important in promoting DC transendothelial migration and DC crawling over the LEC surface. Microvilli formation was dependent on the presence of beta-integrins on the DC side and on integrin conformational affinity to ligand. Finally, we observed that LEC microvilli structures appeared in close vicinity of CCL21 depots and that their assembly was partially inhibited by CCL21-neutralizing antibodies. Therefore, under inflammatory conditions, integrin ligands form three-dimensional membrane projections around DCs. These structures offer docking sites for DC transit from the tissue toward the lymphatic vessel lumen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据