4.7 Article

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Infiltrate the Skin in Positive Tuberculin Skin Test Indurations

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 114-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2011.246

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vetenskapsradet
  2. Swedish International Development Agency
  3. Swedish Society of Medicine
  4. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova)
  5. Swedish Physicians Against AIDS Foundation
  6. Fernstrom Foundation
  7. Wellcome Trust
  8. Medical Research Council (UK)
  9. MRC [MC_U117588499] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [MC_U117588499] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are rarely present in normal skin but have been shown to infiltrate lesions of infections or autoimmune disorders. Here, we report that several DC subsets including CD123(+) BDCA-2/CD303(+) pDCs accumulate in the dermis in indurations induced by the tuberculin skin test (TST), used to screen immune sensitization by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Although the purified protein derivate (PPD) used in the TST did not itself induce pDC recruitment or IFN-alpha production, the positive skin reactions showed high expression of the IFN-alpha-inducible protein MxA. In contrast, the local immune response to PPD was associated with substantial cell death and high expression of the cationic antimicrobial peptide LL37, which together can provide a means for pDC activation and IFN-alpha production. In vitro, pDCs showed low uptake of PPD compared with CD11c(+) and BDCA-3/CD141(+) myeloid DC subsets. Furthermore, supernatants from pDCs activated with LL37-DNA complexes reduced the high PPD uptake in myeloid DCs, as well as decreased their capacity to activate T-cell proliferation. Infiltrating pDCs in the TST reaction site may thus have a regulatory effect upon the antigen processing and presentation functions of surrounding potent myeloid DC subsets to limit potentially detrimental and excessive immune stimulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据