4.7 Article

β2AR Antagonists and β2AR Gene Deletion Both Promote Skin Wound Repair Processes

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 132, 期 8, 页码 2076-2084

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.108

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERDF [05567]
  2. NIH, NIAMS [AR48827]
  3. Wellcome Trust [85586]
  4. MRC [G0901844]
  5. BSF [929 s]
  6. NIH [AR44518]
  7. Shriners' Hospitals [8550]
  8. MRC [G0901844] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [G0901844] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin wound healing is a complex process requiring the coordinated, temporal orchestration of numerous cell types and biological processes to regenerate damaged tissue. Previous work has demonstrated that a functional beta-adrenergic receptor autocrine/paracrine network exists in skin, but the role of beta 2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2AR) in wound healing is unknown. A range of in vitro (single-cell migration, immunoblotting, ELISA, enzyme immunoassay), ex vivo (rat aortic ring assay), and in vivo (chick chorioallantoic membrane assay, zebrafish, murine wild-type, and beta 2AR knockout excisional skin wound models) models were used to demonstrate that blockade or loss of beta 2AR gene deletion promoted wound repair, a finding that is, to our knowledge, previously unreported. Compared with vehicle-only controls, beta 2AR antagonism increased angiogenesis, dermal fibroblast function, and re-epithelialization, but had no effect on wound inflammation in vivo. Skin wounds in beta 2AR knockout mice contracted and re-epithelialized faster in the first few days of wound repair in vivo. beta 2AR antagonism enhanced cell motility through distinct intracellular signalling mechanisms and increased vascular endothelial growth factor secretion from keratinocytes. beta 2AR antagonism promoted wound repair processes in the early stages of wound repair, revealing a possible new avenue for therapeutic intervention. Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2012) 132, 2076-2084; doi:10.1038/jid.2012.108; published online 12 April 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据