4.7 Article

Association Screening in the Epidermal Differentiation Complex (EDC) Identifies an SPRR3 Repeat Number Variant as a Risk Factor for Eczema

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 131, 期 8, 页码 1644-1649

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2011.90

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the Clinical Research Group for Allergy at Charite Berlin
  2. National Genome Research Network (NGFN)
  3. EMBO [522-2006]
  4. Marie Curie EIF fellowship [039868]
  5. [MZ0FNM2005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetically determined impairment of the skin barrier is a primary cause of eczema. As numerous genes essential for an intact epidermis reside within the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC), we screened the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database for putatively functional polymorphisms in the EDC genes and tested them for association with eczema. We identified 20 polymorphisms with predicted major impact on protein function. Of these, 4 were validated in 94 eczema patients: a nonsense mutation in FLG2 (rs12568784), a stop codon mutation in LCE1D (rs41268500), a 24-bp deletion in SPRR3 (rs28989168), and a frameshift mutation in S100A3 (rs11390146). The minor allele frequencies were 15.1, 6.1, 47.2, and 0.4%, respectively. Association testing of the validated polymorphisms in 555 eczema patients and 375 controls identified a significant effect of rs28989168 (SPRR3) on eczema. The association was replicated in another 1,314 cases and 1,322 controls, yielding an overall odds ratio of 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.12-1.51; P = 0.00067) for a dominant mode of inheritance. Small proline-rich proteins (SPRRs) are crossbridging proteins in the cornified cell envelope (CE), which provides the main barrier function of stratified squamous epithelia. The SPRR3 variant associated with eczema carried an extra 24-bp repeat in the central domain, which may alter the physical properties of the CE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据