4.7 Article

PKC-δ and -η, MEKK-1, MEK-6, MEK-3, and p38-δ Are Essential Mediators of the Response of Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes to Differentiating Agents

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 130, 期 8, 页码 2017-2030

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2010.108

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AR046494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies suggest that the novel protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms initiate a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade that regulates keratinocyte differentiation. However, assigning these functions has relied on treatment with pharmacologic inhibitors and/or manipulating kinase function using overexpression of wild-type or dominant-negative kinases. As these methods are not highly specific, an obligatory regulatory role for individual kinases has not been assigned. In this study, we use small interfering RNA knockdown to study the role of individual PKC isoforms as regulators of keratinocyte differentiation induced by the potent differentiating stimulus, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). PKC-delta knockdown reduces TPA-activated involucrin promoter activity, nuclear activator protein-1 factor accumulation and binding to DNA, and cell morphology change. Knockdown of PKC downstream targets, including MEKK-1, MEK-6, MEK-3, or p38-delta, indicates that these kinases are required for these responses. Additional studies indicate that knockdown of PKC-eta inhibits TPA-dependent involucrin promoter activation. In contrast, knockdown of PKC-alpha (a classical PKC isoform) or PKC-epsilon (a novel isoform) does not inhibit these TPA-dependent responses. Further studies indicate that PKC-delta is required for calcium and green tea polyphenol-dependent regulation of end responses. These findings are informative as they suggest an essential role for selected PKC and MAPK cascade enzymes in mediating a range of end responses to a range of differentiation stimuli in keratinocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据