4.7 Article

Increasing Burden of Melanoma in the United States

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 129, 期 7, 页码 1666-1674

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2008.423

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
  2. The National Institutes of Health [R25 CA098566, R01 CA121052]
  3. NIEHS [5P30 ES07048]
  4. National Cancer Institute's Surveillance
  5. Epidemiology and End Results Program [N01-PC-35136, N01-PC-35139, N01-PC-54404]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries [1U58DP00807-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is controversial whether worldwide increases in melanoma incidence represent a true epidemic. Dramatic increases in incidence in the setting of relatively stable mortality trends have also been attributed to expanded skin screening and detection of biologically indolent tumors with low metastatic potential. To better understand how melanoma incidence trends varied by severity at diagnosis and factors relevant to screening access, we assessed recent United States incidence and mortality trends by histologic type, tumor thickness, and area-level socioeconomic status (SES). We obtained population-based data regarding diagnoses of invasive melanoma among non-Hispanic whites from nearly 291 million person-years of observation by the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program (1992-2004). Age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates were calculated for SEER and a subset (California) for which small-area SES measure was available. Overall, melanoma incidence increased at 3.1% (P<0.001) per year. Statistically significant rises occurred for tumors of all histologic subtypes and thicknesses, including those >44mm. Melanoma incidence rates doubled in all SES groups over a 10-year period whereas melanoma mortality rates did not increase significantly. We conclude that screening-associated diagnosis of thinner melanomas cannot explain the increasing rates of thicker melanomas among low SES populations with poorer access to screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据