4.7 Article

Clinical Severity Correlates with Impaired Barrier in Filaggrin-Related Eczema

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 129, 期 3, 页码 682-689

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2008.280

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Skin Foundation
  2. National Eczema Society (UK)
  3. UK Medical Research Council [G0700314]
  4. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan [18390310, 20390304]
  5. MRC [G0700314] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0700314] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the gene-encoding filaggrin (FLG), a key molecule involved in skin barrier function, have been shown to be a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis (AD; eczema). To elucidate the pathomechanisms underlying filaggrin-related AD, we investigated stratum corneum (SC) hydration and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as parameters of barrier function in AD patients harboring FLG mutations compared to AD patients without any FLG mutation. In filaggrin-related AD, SC hydration was both significantly reduced ( P < 0.01-0.05) and thicker (P < 0.01-0.05) than that in healthy controls. TEWL was demonstrably increased in non-filaggrin AD compared to healthy controls ( P < 0.01-0.05). The objective score of atopic dermatitis (OSCORAD), a disease clinical severity index, significantly correlated with TEWL (r = 0.81, P < 0.005), SC hydration (r = -0.65, P < 0.05), and SC thickness (r = 0.59, P < 0.05) in filaggrin-related AD. On the contrary, there was no correlation between these parameters and the OSCORAD in non-filaggrin AD. Furthermore, a significant correlation was obtained between the OSCORAD and specific IgE for house dust (r = 0.66, P < 0.05), mite allergen (r = 0.53, P < 0.05), and cat dander (r = 0.64, P < 0.05) in filaggrin-related AD, but not in non-filaggrin AD. All these data suggest that experimentally demonstrable skin barrier defects due to FLG mutations may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据