4.5 Article

Comparative development and tissue tropism of Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVERTEBRATE PATHOLOGY
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 35-41

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2013.01.001

关键词

Nosema; Honey bee; Tissue tropism; Glands; Transmission; Development

类别

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative, from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [20098511805718, RC293-365/4692038]
  2. USDA-CSREES Project [ILLU-875-302-0205249 S-1024]
  3. Prairie Research Institute, Illinois Natural History Survey at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two etiological agents of nosema disease in honey bees, Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia: Nosematidae), reproduce in the midgut tissues of the host. N. apis is tissue specific but the development and tissue tropism of N. ceranae is not well understood. Our investigations compared development of the two phylogenetically related pathogens in all major host tissues. Using microscopy, PCR and qPCR quantification to evaluate tissue tropism of infected bees in communal cages and of individually restrained infected bees, we found no detectable spores in cephalic or other body tissues except midgut tissues. Nosema DNA was detected in Malpighian tubules but the tubules could not be separated from the alimentary tract without release of spores from the midgut. Nosema DNA was not detected in hemolymph sampled from the head capsule or the abdomen of infected bees. We confirmed that N. ceranae only develops in midgut tissues. Spores of both species released from host midgut cells accumulated in the hindgut lumen, and we noted differences in numbers and ratios of spore types and in growth curves between the two pathogens. N. apis reached a consistent level of spore production after 12 days post inoculation (dpi); N. ceranae spore production increased linearly from 12 to 20 dpi and the number of. mature N. ceranae spores was consistently higher. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据