4.3 Article

Correlation between Oxidative Stress and L-type Calcium Channel Expression in the Ventricular Myocardia of Selenium-deficient Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 1677-1687

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/030006051204000507

关键词

CACNA1C GENE (CALCIUM CHANNEL, VOLTAGE-DEPENDENT, L-TYPE, ALPHA 1C SUBUNIT); L-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNELS; MICE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; SELENIUM DEFICIENCY; VENTRICULAR MYOCARDIUM

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30771863, 81172616]
  2. Science & Technology Innovation Foundation of Harbin [2008RFXXS019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Expression of the Cacna1c (calcium channel, voltage-dependent, L-type, alpha 1C subunit) gene was studied to investigate the relationship between oxidative stress and L-type calcium channels in the myocardium of selenium-deficient mice. METHODS: Selenium levels in liver and heart tissue samples from mice fed normal or selenium-deficient diets were evaluated by fluorometry. In the same mice, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and Cacna1c gene expression were analysed, malondialdehyde (MDA) content and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity were measured, oxidoreductase gene expression profiles were analysed (by DNA microarray), and myocardial structural changes were studied. RESULTS: In selenium-deficient versus control mice, GPx expression and SOD activity were decreased, and Cacna1c expression and MDA concentration were increased. Selenoprotein oxidoreductase and nonselenoprotein oxidoreductase gene expression differed significantly between selenium-deficient and control mice. In selenium-deficient mice, myocardial fibres were separated by loose collagenous tissue; electron microscopy showed shortened sarcomeres, dilated sarcoplasmic reticulum, scattered myofibril lysis and increased mitochondria with amorphous matrix densities. CONCLUSION: L-type calcium channels were involved in selenium deficiency-induced cardiomyocyte injury, which was positively related to oxidative stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据