4.3 Article

Performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/9/01/P01002

关键词

Particle tracking detectors; Particle tracking detectors (Gaseous detectors)

资金

  1. CERN
  2. CAPES (Brazil)
  3. CNPq (Brazil)
  4. FAPERJ (Brazil)
  5. FINEP (Brazil)
  6. NSFC (China)
  7. CNRS/IN2P3 (France)
  8. Region Auvergne (France)
  9. BMBF (Germany)
  10. DFG (Germany)
  11. HGF (Germany)
  12. MPG (Germany)
  13. SFI (Ireland)
  14. INFN (Italy)
  15. FOM (The Netherlands)
  16. NWO (The Netherlands)
  17. SCSR (Poland)
  18. MEN/IFA (Romania)
  19. MinES (Russia)
  20. Rosatom (Russia)
  21. RFBR (Russia)
  22. NRC Kurchatov Institute (Russia)
  23. MinECo (Spain)
  24. XuntaGal (Spain)
  25. GENCAT (Spain)
  26. SNSF (Switzerland)
  27. SER (Switzerland)
  28. NAS Ukraine (Ukraine)
  29. STFC (United Kingdom)
  30. NSF (USA)
  31. ERC under FP7
  32. IN2P3 (France)
  33. KIT (Germany)
  34. SURF (The Netherlands)
  35. PIC (Spain)
  36. GridPP (United Kingdom)
  37. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H001085/2, ST/H001085/1, ST/J005568/1, ST/K000748/1, ST/K00140X/1 LHCb, ST/K00140X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  38. STFC [ST/K000748/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The LHCb Outer Tracker is a gaseous detector covering an area of 5 x 6 m(2) with 12 double layers of straw tubes. The detector with its services are described together with the commissioning and calibration procedures. Based on data of the first LHC running period from 2010 to 2012, the performance of the readout electronics and the single hit resolution and efficiency are presented. The efficiency to detect a hit in the central half of the straw is estimated to be 99.2%, and the position resolution is determined to be approximately 200 mu m. The Outer Tracker received a dose in the hottest region corresponding to 0.12 C/cm, and no signs of gain deterioration or other ageing effects are observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据