4.3 Article

Antennas for the detection of radio emission pulses from cosmic-ray induced air showers at the Pierre Auger Observatory

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/7/10/P10011

关键词

Large detector systems for particle and astroparticle physics; Antennas

资金

  1. STFC [ST/J000507/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J000507/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Physics [1068210, 0855623, 1068696] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Physics
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1212538] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Pierre Auger Observatory is exploring the potential of the radio detection technique to study extensive air showers induced by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. The Auger Engineering Radio Array (AERA) addresses both technological and scientific aspects of the radio technique. A first phase of AERA has been operating since September 2010 with detector stations observing radio signals at frequencies between 30 and 80 MHz. In this paper we present comparative studies to identify and optimize the antenna design for the final configuration of AERA consisting of 160 individual radio detector stations. The transient nature of the air shower signal requires a detailed description of the antenna sensor. As the ultra-wideband reception of pulses is not widely discussed in antenna literature, we review the relevant antenna characteristics and enhance theoretical considerations towards the impulse response of antennas including polarization effects and multiple signal reflections. On the basis of the vector effective length we study the transient response characteristics of three candidate antennas in the time domain. Observing the variation of the continuous galactic background intensity we rank the antennas with respect to the noise level added to the galactic signal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据