4.6 Article

Preliminary results of a phase II randomized study to determine the efficacy and safety of genetically engineered allogeneic human chondrocytes expressing TGF-β1 in patients with grade 3 chronic degenerative joint disease of the knee

期刊

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 2109-2118

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.06.019

关键词

Osteoarthritis; Knee; Pain; TissueGene; Genetically modified; Growth factors

资金

  1. TissueGene Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study was to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of injectable genetically engineered chondrocytes virally transduced with TGF-beta 1 (GEC-TGF-beta 1) compared to placebo. Design: A multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study of adults with knee osteoarthritis. A total of 102 patients were 2: 1 randomized to GEC-TGF-b1 or placebo. Primary outcomes assessed were (1) function of the knee joint, scored using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC); and (2) pain, measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints assessed were pain and analgesic use, quality of life (QOL), and adverse events (AEs) including need for total knee arthroplasty after treatment. Results: IKDC showed significant improvement in the GEC-TGF-b1 group over the placebo at week 12 (least mean square difference (LSMD): 10.3; P = 0.0342), week 52 (LSMD: 13.6; P = 0.0082), and overall (LSMD: 8.6; P = 0.0453). VAS Analysis showed a significant improvement in GEC-TGF-beta 1 group compared to placebo at weeks 12 (LSMD: - 13.8; P = 0.0162), 52 (LSMD: - 13.1; P = 0.0332), and overall (LSMD: - 10.1; P = 0.0350). Reduction in pain severity at week 12 and 52, frequency at 24 h and week 52, and the percentage of patients in the GEC-TGF-beta 1 group receiving analgesics at week 4 (27 vs 40%) and 12 (27 vs 37%) was observed. Conclusions: GEC-TGF-beta 1 patients had more positive responses on the IKDC, VAS, and were less likely to require analgesics. (C) 2015 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据