4.5 Article

Genetic Characterization of Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) Breeding and Hybrid Lines With Different Geographic Origins

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu073

关键词

genetic diversity; population structure; polymorphism; microsatellite; inbreeding

资金

  1. project: Organizing the National Interest Postdoctoral School of Applied Biotechnologies with Impact on Romanian Bioeconomy, [2010 POSDRU/89/1.5/S/52432]
  2. European Social Fund through the Sectorial Operational Programme Human Resources Development
  3. project RoBeeTech [POS CCE 206/20.07.2010, 618/12460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The domesticated silkworm Bombyx mori L. comprises a large number of geographical breeds and hybrid lines. Knowing the genetic structure of those may provide information to improve the conservation of commercial lines by estimating inbreeding over generations and the consequences of excessive use of those lineages. Here, we analyzed the genetic diversity of seven breeds and eight hybrid lines from Eastern Europe and Asia using highly polymorphic microsatellites markers to determine its genetical impact on their use in global breeding programs. No consistent pattern of deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was found for most breed and hybrids; and the absence of a linkage disequilibrium also suggests that the strains are in equilibrium. A principal coordinate analysis revealed a clear separation of two silkworm breeds from the rest: one (IBV) originated from India and the other one (RG(90)) from Romania/Japan. The tendency of the other breeds from different geographic origins to cluster together in a general mix might be due to similar selection pressures (climate and anthropogenic factors) in different geographic locations. Phylogenetic analyses grouped the different silkworm breeds but not the hybrids according to their geographic origin and confirmed the pattern found in the principal coordinate analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据