4.5 Article

Identification and tissue distribution of odorant binding protein genes in the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 7, 页码 722-728

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2013.02.011

关键词

Odorant binding protein; Olfaction; Antennae; Expression pattern; Spodoptera exigua

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31160354, 31260449]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Odorant binding proteins (OBPs) contribute to the remarkable sensitivity of the insect's olfactory system and play an important role in insect chemical communication. In this study, we identified 11 putative cDNAs encoding OBPs (namely SexiOBP1-11) from the antennal full length cDNA library of the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and examined their expression profiles in different adult body tissues (antennae, heads, thoraxes, abdomens, legs and wings) by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). All SexiOBPs had the characteristic typical features of the OBP family, with the exception of SexiOBP11, which lacked the predicted signal peptide sequence at the N-terminus. qPCR revealed that all of these genes were highly transcribed in the antennae. SexiOBP1-4 and SexiOBP10 were dominantly restricted to antennae. Within antennae, SexiOBP2-4 and SexiOBP10 exhibited female-biased expression patterns, while the expression of SexiOBP7 was male-biased, indicating that they might be involved in interacting with sex pheromones. In general, these OBPs were mainly expressed in chemosensory-specific tissues, although some displayed non-chemosensory or ubiquitous tissue expression. The data is helpful for further determining the potential physiological functions of S. exigua OBPs, and paves the way towards a better understanding of the chemosensory perception of this pest, which may help to uncover new targets for behavioral interference used as a control strategy. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据