4.1 Article

Mating Strategies in Solitary Aphid Parasitoids: Effect of Patch Residence Time and Ant Attendance

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 80-95

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-011-9279-3

关键词

Aphidiinae; Braconidae; foraging; local mate competition; natal patch; sex ratio

资金

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD)
  2. German Research Council (DFG) [Vo 628/3-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mate finding and dispersal from the natal patch in parasitoid Hymenoptera are influenced by the availability of host resources and interactions with other organisms. We compared the mating behavior of three solitary aphid parasitoids, Aphidius ervi Haliday, Lysiphlebus hirticornis Mackauer and Pauesia pini (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) that differ in host resource exploitation and ant mutualism. In L. hirticornis, which is obligately ant-attended, the residence time on the natal patch was approximately 4 h compared with less than 2 h in the facultatively ant-attended P. pini; the sexes did not differ in residence time. Females of A. ervi, which is not attended by ants, stayed for slightly more than 2 h on the natal patch while their male siblings remained for only 1 h. In L. hirticornis, 90% of all siblings in a clutch mated on the natal patch but only 13% in A. ervi and 42% in P. pini did so. Off-patch matings (23%) were observed only in A. ervi. Males and females of L. hirticornis were 12-times more likely to mate on the natal patch when aphids and ants were present than when either of the latter species was removed; and patch residence time declined from approximately 4 h to approximately 2.5 h in the absence of either aphids or ants. We propose that, in aphidiine wasps and perhaps other quasigregarious parasitoids, mating behavior is influenced by the availability of resources on the natal patch and the presence or absence of trophobiotic ants. Partial sib mating is expected in species producing large clutches and having a long patch residence time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据