4.6 Article

A rhodium(III) complex inhibits LPS-induced nitric oxide production and angiogenic activity in cellulo

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 23-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.06.020

关键词

Rhodium; Metal complex; Nitric oxide; NF-kappa B; Angiogenesis

资金

  1. Hong Kong Baptist University [FRG2/12-13/021, FRG2/13-14/008]
  2. Centre for Cancer and Inflammation Research, School of Chinese Medicine
  3. Health and Medical Research Fund [HMRF/13121482]
  4. Research Grants Council [HKBU/201811, HKBU/204612, HKBU/201913]
  5. French National Research Agency/Research Grants Council Joint Research Scheme [A-HKBU201/12]
  6. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macao SAR [103/2012/A3]
  7. University of Macau [MYRG091(Y3-L2)-ICMS12-LCH, MYRG121(Y3-L2)-ICMS12-LCH, MRG023/LCH/2013/ICMS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-containing complexes have arisen as viable alternatives to organic molecules as therapeutic agents. Metal complexes possess a number of advantages compared to conventional carbon-based compounds, such as distinct geometries, interesting electronic properties, variable oxidation states and the ability to arrange different ligands around the metal centre in a precise fashion. Meanwhile, nitric oxide (NO) plays key roles in the regulation of angiogenesis, vascular permeability and inflammation. We herein report a novel cyclometalated rhodium(III) complex as an inhibitor of lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced NO production in RAW264.7 macrophages. Experiments suggested that the inhibition of NO production in cells by complex 1 was mediated through the down-regulation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) activity. Furthermore, complex 1 inhibited angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) as revealed by an endothelial tube formation assay. This study demonstrates that kinetically inert rhodium(III) complexes may be potentially developed as effective anti-angiogenic agents. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据